Recognition
Five accounts. Nobody can see the total.
That's usually the actual complaint, once you get past "we need better cards." Not the limit on any single entity. The fact that nobody in finance can answer "what's our group-wide exposure right now" without pulling five separate statements together by hand.
Why it happens
Standard applications assume one entity
Most card products are built around a single applying entity. Group structures don't fit that shape naturally, so businesses default to applying separately per entity, then discover nobody has a consolidated view of group-wide exposure.
Where this fits
A sharper angle within Business Credit Cards
This sits within Business Credit Cards as the specific answer for multi-entity groups, rather than a separate facility type.
Specialist insight
The actual question, not "which card has the highest limit"
The useful question isn't which single card product has the biggest headline limit. It's how to get sensible spend controls and consolidated reporting across the group without opening a separate account, with separate liability, for every entity.
Decision helper
What typically fits
- One facility with individual cards issued to each entity or cardholder, rather than five separate applications and five separate credit relationships.
- Centralised liability, so the group's overall exposure is visible in one place.
- Consolidated reporting that a finance team can actually reconcile against group management accounts.
One thing we've noticed: the trigger usually isn't spend growth, it's an audit or a funding round where someone outside the business asks for group-wide exposure and it takes days to produce, not minutes. That's normally the point a fragmented setup stops being a minor annoyance and starts being fixed.
Alternatives and limitations
What lenders actually look at: group turnover and cash position, not just the individual entity applying; intercompany structure and how spend genuinely flows through the group; whether the requesting entity has its own trading history or is a newer subsidiary of an established parent. Comparing cards on cashback or headline perks is a different, more commoditised market than this.